Food · Premier Protein
Premier Protein Chocolate Shake
643843000016
Okay nutrition · Ultra-processed · per 100 ml
Ultra-processed — built with extras a kitchen wouldn’t use. Better as a rare treat, not a Good rating.
Better than most of Protein — 17 of 25 sit at or below this number.
Council note
Ultra-processed — flavours, extras, a list a kitchen would not write. A dietitian would not make this a weekday habit. Better than most of Protein — 17 of 25 sit at or below this number.
The pack
Ultra-processed — built with extras a kitchen wouldn’t use. Better as a rare treat, not a Good rating.
How often
Rarely
Who it’s for
Anyone comparing similar products in this aisle.
Skip if
It clashes with the notes you keep in your profile — allergens, diet, or extras you asked us to flag.
- Okay nutrition cannot be rated Excellent
- Ultra-processed food cannot be rated Good
- Stacked sweeteners cannot be rated Good
At a glance
How often
Rarely
Nutrition box
Okay
How processed
Ultra-processed
Extras
4 additives
Planet
Mixed footprint · 52/100
Organic
Not organic
Built in a factory with additives, flavours, or refined extras. Cannot be rated Good — a rare treat, not a habit.
Some good signs, some industrial ones. Not the heaviest in the aisle.
No shelf price logged yet. When a shopper posts a receipt to Open Prices, it lands here.
Why this number
Ultra-processed — built with extras a kitchen wouldn’t use. Better as a rare treat, not a Good rating.
Poor · 49/100 · nutrition okay
- Nutrition quality63/100
- Ingredients66/100
- How processed16/100
- Organic0/100
The extras on the list set the limit. A high-concern ingredient, or a cluster of them, blocks a better rating.
What pulled it down
Okay nutrition cannot be rated Excellent
The box is middling. That is fine as a sometimes food. It is not everyday Excellent.
Ultra-processed food cannot be rated Good
A factory recipe — flavours, colours, or many additives — cannot be rated Good. A sometimes treat, not a daily habit.
Stacked sweeteners cannot be rated Good
A cluster of extras keeps this at Poor: a sometimes product, not a habit.
An okay nutrition box
Sugars are modest. Some fibre helps. Middling — fine sometimes.
Ultra-processed
Built in a factory with additives, flavours, or refined extras. A growing pile of research ties a diet of these to poorer health — not because one biscuit is poison, but because the pattern crowds out real food.
Sucralose
-5Chlorinated sweetener. Heat-degradation products are a concern in baking.
Carrageenan
-14Degraded carrageenan is inflammatory in animal studies. Debate continues.
Natural flavouring
-5Undisclosed mixture. Usually low toxicological risk, poor transparency.
Stacked intense sweeteners
-10Two or more intense sweeteners in one product is a diet-drink pattern, not a quiet recipe.
Nutrition is half the number. Ingredients a quarter. How processed a fifth. Organic is a small bonus — it cannot rescue a sugary drink or a nitrite ham. How this compares to Nutri-Score
Nutrition · per 100 ml
| Energy | 250 kJ |
|---|---|
| Sugars | 1 gLow A light amount of sugar for a drink. |
| Saturated fat | 1 gMedium |
| Salt | 0.3 gLow Light on salt. |
| Fibre | 3 g |
| Protein | 13 g |
Better neighbours
Same aisle, cleaner number. Ranked by how close the job is — not by who paid.
Ingredients
Water, milk protein concentrate, cocoa, calcium caseinate, sucralose, acesulfame K, carrageenan, natural flavour.
CarrageenanE407
−14Some people find it rough on the gut. Debate continues; we treat it as worth watching.
SucraloseE955
−5Holds up in the bottle; less lovely when baked hot. Gut questions exist at high doses.
Natural flavouring
−5Not a toxin. A sign the recipe needed a perfume. You cannot tell what is inside from the words.
Milk
No concernA staple for people who digest it. An allergen for people who don’t.
Steviol glycosidesE960
No concernWell studied at usual doses. Taste is the only argument.
Protein aisleMore from Premier ProteinHow scoring worksPack facts (open data)
Healthie is a reading aid, not a diagnosis. If you have an allergy, always check the pack.